Add new comment

Submitted by Alexander Friday, 21/12/2012

In reply to by Julian

Damning can frequently be better and fairer than cautious. I do counter-tasting regularly, and almost invariably find myself very VERY relieved to reaffirm my first impression (and subsequently feel peeved to have wasted some money on a second bottle, just for foolishly doubting my own expurtaise... :-P).

On very rare occasions (every odd planet conjunction) I modify an assessment, like with the Hahnmühle Silvaner "Gäseritsch". A wine that tries so very very hard. You want to pat it on the shoulder and tell it: "relax, chill a bit, the bodybuilding contest just got a break!"

I do wonder however and why in the case of the Maulbronner Eilfingerberg, two different fillings out of a steel tank within a span of 3/4 or 2/3 of a year could or would be so different. I hope nobody will try to tell me about "Jugendböckser" (juvenile flatulence), "Füllkrankheit" (filling sickness) and the like. Such convenient catch-all terms would not match this specific wine, the clear heavy structural flaws hat both ramblers noted, and the wine's production history, in my feeling.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Comments

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.